The
Contribution of Terrestrial and Anthropogenic Processes to Atmospheric CO2
Concentrations in the Mid Continent North American Carbon
Program (NACP) Study
Meeting
goals:
·
Initiate the implementation of the NACP Midwest intensive, and
begin drafting an implementation plan
·
Ascertain data and expertise available for the NACP Midwest
intensive
·
Identify an initial (more can join) science team to develop
the NACP Midwest intensive implementation plan
·
Initiate the development of a framework to guide/optimize
data collection (sampling density –space and time)
Expected
outcomes:
By the end of
the meeting participants should have:
· an understanding
of the goals and information needs of NACP Midwest intensive.
· identified
current relevant research and available data and its accessibility.
· identified data
gaps and on-going studies to fill in the data gaps or new studies needed.
· identified models
available and their data needs.
· a conceptual
strategy for integrating terrestrial, flux, and atmospheric research and data.
· begun developing
the NACP Midwest intensive implementation plan.
· made
recommendations to the CCIWG agencies and their programs for addressing data
gaps and implementation of the NACP Midwest intensive.
· initiated the
next steps for implementation of the NACP Midwest intensive
The
role of the speakers is to very briefly introduce the topic, why it is needed
for the NACP Midwest intensive and identify resources, data available, and
gaps.
Why
are we here and what are we going to do?
11:30 Ray
Desjardins - A Canadian looks at Iowa
1:00 PM C.
Rice, Chair
The Disciplinary working groups
will be assembled to evaluate whether there are additional data, resources, and
gaps in the whole program (beyond those identified by the speakers) and how
data and gap-filling activities should be coordinated. Each group will restate
the meeting goals as they see them and the expertise that each group can
contribute to the project goals. This then leads to a discussion of what is
needed from the other groups so that we can have a truly interdisciplinary
project.
8:00 AM Jerry
Hatfield Chair
The interdisciplinary working
groups will address several questions: What we need from each other? How good
does the data have to be? Do we need standardized reporting formats? What kind
of output will be produced such as papers, reports, web sites, newspaper
articles, data repositories? This is an
opportunity to initiate the establishment of some of the required
interdisciplinary contacts and to identify some of the general scientific
advances and hypothesis that should be generated by this study.
The groups that met Tuesday evening will reassemble to further develop
the actual data synthesis research and monitoring programs with a concentration
of what is needed within the expertise represented. For example: How do we use
available statistical and other data to determine yields and residues? Are
these are important? What kinds of soil measurements need to be made? How do we
use remote sensing and automated in situ
soil analysis. How do tall tower and airplane studies mesh? Is soil respiration
a problem in flux measurements? There are many more and we are sure these
discussions will be most productive.
Since we want the meeting to be
flexible, we have left this session fairly open. Participants may want to
define further discussion groups or ask that existing ones have more time. This
would also be an opportunity for specific working groups such as data
synthesis, modeling, or foresters to meet. Others we can think of include
questions about erosion and landscapes, movements of products, anthropogenic
fluxes, role of underground productivity and roots, role of agriflux or
chambers, and many more. This will require volunteer chairpersons to identify
discussion areas and contact Eldor or Jerry before or early at the meeting.
Composition of groups and subjects will be determined
during the course of the meeting. This is our last chance to get it right.
Subjects could include cooperation between groups, other information that could
be obtained such as impacts on C-credits and agricultural management,
interactions with other areas (national and global), timing of experiments and
data, etc. How do we rationalize if the top-down and bottom-up data differ?
1:45 PM Reports
and discussion
Subjects could include: meeting output (type of report and
contents). The Soil Tilth Lab will supply an electronic coordinator during thee
discussion periods. Each discussion group will be asked have their comments on
computers in a format ready for publication on the web site and in the hard
copy output. Rich Conant will compile the meeting information so that when we
leave we are as close as possible to an agreed output. Other subjects could
include implementation plans, coordination within and between groups, funding
requirements, final discussions, and closing statements (E.A. Paul).