DRAFT SCIENCE PLAN LAND USE IN TEMPERATE EAST ASIA (LUTEA)

A LUCC and TEACOM sanctioned project


Chairperson of LUTEA Steering Committee
Dennis S. OJIMA

Members of the LUTEA Steering Committee
CHULUUN Togtohyn
FU Congbin
KARAKIN, Vladimir
KITAMURA, Teitaro
LEE, Dowon
LIU, Ji-yuan
HIMIYAMA, Yukio
OTSUBO, Kuninori *
ZHAO Shidong

LUTEA is sponsored by START and APN

(* Kuninori Ostubo contributed in the writing of the Science Plan as part of his role as a member of the TEACOM steering committee)

draft report
do not cite or distribute

LAND USE IN TEMPERATE EAST ASIA

(LUTEA)

PREAMBLE

The growing concern over the impact of changes in land use and land cover on environmental conditions and the increasing human impact on the natural resources in the Temperate East Asian region has captured the attention of the political and scientific community world-wide. In order to better understand the factors affecting changes in land use and cover in the region, and how these changes will interact with further global environmental changes the Land Use in Temperate East Asia (LUTEA) steering committee was formed by the START-Temperate East Asia Committee (TEACOM). The steering committee has been charged to develop a research framework to better facilitate interactions among the research groups actively investigating aspects of land use and land cover changes in the region, and to serve the policy community in order to better evaluate policy decisions on issues related to food security and environmental degradation in the region.

The LUTEA steering committee has deliberated for the past two years and recently held a workshop to bring together scientist engaged in land use/cover change research. The workshop included committee members of the International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme and International Human Dimension Programme (IGBP/IHDP) Core Project on Land Use and Cover Change (LUCC). At this workshop, the scientists and the LUCC members jointly made several recommendations. These include:

The agreement to develop a network of the research groups, the LUTEA Network;
To promote communication between the members of the LUTEA network;
To share information and findings among the participants of the LUTEA network.

The function of the LUTEA network will be:

to facilitate information exchange among various research groups conducting studies related to LUCC;
to provide an integrating framework for synthesis studies and to conduct regional synthesis of LUCC related projects in the region;
to identify critical research themes and gaps in information regarding LUCC studies in the region.
to facilitate cross-regional interactions dealing with LUCC-related studies.

This document is a distillation of the past two years of deliberation and survey of the research groups willing to participate and to form the nucleus of the LUTEA Network. The document provides a brief scientific rationale of the need for the LUTEA network and describes the framework for collaboration. This science plan incorporates input from two workshops held in Kyoto, Japan (8 and 9 November 1996) and Beijing, China 2 to 5 March 1998. The meetings have been sponsored with financial support from START, APN, and LUCC.

The steering committee is very grateful for the support that the START secretariat, TEACOM secretariat, the Asian Pacific Network, the National Institute for Environmental Studies of Japan, the Chinese Academy of Sciences CISNAR for there financial and logistical support. Without the support of these organizations the development of LUTEA would not have been possible. In addition, the steering committee is very grateful to the scientists who have contributed their time and effort in the formation of the LUTEA network and the willingness to collaborate in this important scientific and social endeavor.

Dennis S. OJIMA, Chairperson of LUTEA Steering Committee

Members of the LUTEA Steering Committee:
CHULUUN Togtohyn
FU Congbin
KARAKIN, Vladimir
KITAMURA, Teitaro
LEE, Dowon
LIU, Ji-yuan
HIMIYAMA, Yukio
OTSUBO, Kuninori *
ZHAO Shidong

(* Kuninori Ostubo contributed in the writing of the Science Plan as part of his role as a member of the TEACOM steering committee)

INTRODUCTION

The region of Temperate East Asia has long been recognized for its wealth of natural and human resources. However recently, concern related to the changing environmental conditions in the region due to increasing human pressures degrading the environment have captured the attention of the scientific and political communities. The role of land use and land cover change in maintaining and in some cases leading to the degradation of the environmental health and sustainability of human welfare is a critical to the future of the region. The increasing dependence and utilization of the land and water resources in this region will further tax the limits of the ecological systems and increase the risk of environmental degradation. In addition, the need to produce food and clean water for the growing number of people in the region will further focus attention on the changes in land use and land cover in the region.

Growing from this concern to better understand the factors determining land use and land cover changes in the region and evaluate the potential impact these changes will have on the human condition and future global environmental change, the Temperate East Asian Committee of START (TEACOM) sponsored a working group to develop a science plan for land use and cover change studies in this region. The Land Use in Temperate East Asia (LUTEA) working group developed a science plan and organized two workshops (LUTEA workshop November 8-9, 1996 in Kyoto, Japan and 2 to 5 March 1998 in Beijing, China, participants listed in Appendix 1) to refine the science plan and to develop an implementation strategy for LUTEA research activities. This document is the outgrowth of the LUTEA working group deliberations and the consensus view of the participants of the Kyoto and Beijing workshops.

This science plan provides the background for land use and cover change studies in the region, defines the structure of the LUTEA activities and outlines the next steps in the implementation of the LUTEA activities.

LUTEA OBJECTIVES

Our overall objectives are 1) to better understand the role and consequences of changes in climate, ecosystem dynamics, human demography, and socio-economic transitions on land use and land cover in temperate East Asia during the past 100 years and into the next decade; and 2) develop a mechanism to assess the short-term and long-term changes in food security and environmental conservation in the TEA region. The region of study extends from China; Korea, DPR; Korea, R; Japan; Mongolia; and Eastern Russia (Figure 1, TEAL map of land cover).

Specific objectives include:

Investigate the causes of land use/cover changes and estimate the relative contributions of socio-economic and physical-environmental drivers to land use change over historical time (i.e., past 30 to 40 years);
To develop models to be used in the assessment of projected changes of land use given current socio-economic and physical-environmental conditions in the temperate East Asian region into the next decade;
Assess the impact of global change and land use changes on sustainable development related to food security and environmental degradation of the TEA region;
Analyze the policy implications of land use/cover changes for climate dynamics, ecosystem integrity, sustainable development, and economic growth and stability.

In view of the important role of land use/cover change in this region to past and future changes in global earth system dynamics and the sustainable development of the region, the TEACOM steering committee on LUCC related studies has determined to develop coordination and integration entity for this region in the form of a network.

The function of the LUTEA network is:

to facilitate information exchange among various research groups conducting studies related to LUCC;
to provide an integrating framework for synthesis studies and to conduct regional synthesis of LUCC related projects in the region;
to identify critical research themes and gaps in information regarding LUCC studies in the region.
to facilitate cross-regional interactions dealing with LUCC-related studies.

The LUTEA steering committee has identified several key scientific issues related to land use/cover changes and these are consistent with the LUCC core project initiatives. These issues are:

What changes have taken place in the land use/cover changes within the region, especially in the transitional zones of ecosystems (such as the semi-arid regions)?
What are the driving forces (human and natural factors) of changes in land use/cover?
How will global change and potential land use changes affect the food security and environmental degradation within the TEA region?
To what extent can current human activities be modified to mitigate the negative global changes?
How do these changes of land surface processes feedback to the regional climate and their possible global consequences?

BACKGROUND

Land use/cover changes in the Temperate East Asian (TEA) region has been a major factor in ecosystem changes for a long period of time. Agricultural and livestock developments have been recorded for millennia in this region. Currently the region is one of the most densely populated regions of the world. Due to a long history of environmental exploitation and recent population increases, the region is prone to environmental stresses such as salinization, desertification, deforestation, soil erosion, water pollution and air pollution. The impact of human activities on ecosystem dynamics and biogeochemical exchanges with the atmosphere have resulted in dramatic changes in the fluxes of C, N, and other atmospheric constituents in the region.

This region covers all of East-Central Asia and South-East Asia north of the Philippines and south of the Arctic Circle. The climate is generally humid to semiarid and determined chiefly by the monsoonal circulation. A strong north to south rainfall and temperature gradient exists. Vegetation and land use practices change systematically across this north to south gradient with cool temperate forest and grasslands in the north where pastoral and forestry land use dominate. Toward the south more arable land is found in regions with mixed broad leaf forest, croplands, and ricefields.

The influence of land use change on terrestrial carbon dynamics constitutes a core research focus of the International Geosphere-Biosphere Program (IGBP) (IGBP Report 21, [Steffen et al. 1992] and IGBP Report 24 [Turner et al. 1993]). Land use decisions are driven by mostly demographic and economic considerations at broad scales and by a medley of social, economic and environmental considerations at regional and local scales. Turner and Meyer (1991) recognized that the driving forces of land use change are different at different spatial scales, though some forces cut across all scales, such as population change. We agree, and argue that a hierarchical or spatially nested analytical framework is needed in order to understand how driving forces of land use and climate changes transform land covers at local to regional scales. In order to develop this frame work, there are currently a number of active research groups conducting studies related to LUTEA objectives. In addition to the existing studies, an IGBP transect has been established to carry out LUTEA studies.

LUTEA RESEARCH NETWORK

Research in the region on various aspects of land use and land cover change is well developed. Research conducted by scientists from around the world are currently engaged in investigations ranging from changes in population affecting land use and natural resources, to impact of intensification of agriculture practices on atmospheric pollution. Studies are being conducted by social and physical scientists on various aspects of the land use and land cover change issues. However, many of the researchers are not aware of what other related research is being conducted and what information has already been gathered that may be relevant to their own research. The development of the LUTEA network will provide a mechanism for greater exchange of information useful for the scientific and the policy communities alike. The network will provide a vehicle for development of common databases that are needed by many of the LUTEA research groups. The workshop in Kyoto initiated the development of the network and we plan to hold a series of similar meetings to further facilitate the exchange of information.

Network Structure

The LUTEA Network consists of existing research groups engaged in investigations within the region (see Appendix of Ongoing LUTEA related Research). The research activities are categorized in topical (or sectoral) issues that are regionally relevant and in description of analytical and assessment methodologies employed by the research groups. The network members have agreed to share information and work together to develop analytical tools and databases in order to better address land use/cover changes in the region and the impact these will have on human welfare and environmental conditions. This information will also serve as a useful tool for policy makers and for evaluation of policy decisions.

The proposed structure of the LUTEA network will be to utilize gradients of important driving factors, such as physical conditions, natural resource base, land use, and economic development, to focus the research efforts in the region. The project will utilize information gathered from past and ongoing research efforts in this region. The use of transects to conduct the gradient analysis will be implemented where feasible. The North East China Transect will be available for this study, and discussion of developing another north-south transect is being considered. The transects will not be the only mechanism to integrate the research findings. The network will pull together information from a number of sources to address research issues along tropical or sectoral foci. The steering committee has selected four topical issues of regional and sectoral importance to the TEA region and defines the initial set of studies and integration activities. The regional sectoral issues are:

Factors Affecting Changes in Pastoral Systems
Intensification of Agriculture.
Urban-Rural Interfaces
Factors Affecting Changes in Natural and Managed Forests

The integration activities are:

Development of Critical Databases on Physical, Ecological and Social-Economic Factors
Development of Analytical Procedures
Strategy for Modeling Activities

Rationale for Transects and Gradients Studies

Currently, the North East China Transect (NECT), centered on the 43.5 latitude line, is defined for regions in China. The ecosystems include forests, croplands and grasslands. The transect is defined by a strong rainfall gradient, and includes a variety of land use options. The transect also includes three long-term ecological research sites operated by the Chinese Ecological research network (CERN of the CAS). The LUTEA will utilize this transect for investigating land use changes in this region of TEA. It has been proposed for the extension of this transect to extend into Mongolia to facilitate comparisons in land use intensity.

A north-south transect is proposed that would represent a gradient in rainfall and socio-economic factors. This north-south oriented transect would also capture the potential changes land surface exchanges that may interact with the monsoonal incursions that strongly determine rainfall patterns in this region of the world. These transects will serve as initial study areas to better quantify changes in land use and cover dating the past several decades.

Major Sectoral Regional Research Activities

Factors Affecting Changes in Pastoral Systems

Background. In the semiarid regions of the TEA, nomadic pastoralism has been the dominant agronomic activity for many centuries. Recently changes in cultural, political and economic factors have caused changes in how the pastoral systems operate within the region. Currently, a range of pastoral systems are operating in the region of China, Mongolia, and Russia. These systems encompass a range of grazing patterns (i.e., frequency, intensity of grazing and the types of animals). These systems have incorporated new breeding stocks that are potentially not suitable to certain climate regimes (e.g., drought conditions of the Gobi desert, cold hardiness against severe winter storms in the Inner Mongolian and Mongolian steppe region). These changes in pastoral management have altered the nomadic patterns of the region.

Pastoral systems, where humans depend on livestock, exist largely in arid or semi-arid ecosystems where climate is highly variable. Thus in many ways pastoral livestock systems are intimately adapted to climatic variability. In general, there is a direct relationship between climate variability and the spatial scale of pastoral exploitation. Extensive nomadic systems are found in the most variable regions; less extensive, more intensive modes of livestock management occur in less variable grazing lands. Climate change in drylands can thus be expected to have important implications for the dynamics and viability of pastoral people, their exploitation patterns and through these exploitation patterns, on land cover and land cover change.

We also recognize the pervasive role of demographic, political and economic driving forces on pastoral exploitation. The general trend involves greater intensification of resource exploitation at the expense of traditional patterns of extensive range utilization. This set of drivers is orthogonal to the above described climate drivers. Thus we expect climate-land use-land cover relationships to be crucially modified by the socio-economic forces mentioned above. Nevertheless, the fundamental relationship between climate variability and pastoral exploitation patterns will still form the environmental framework for overall patterns of land use-land cover change.

In addition, recent political and economic changes (i.e., in the past 50 years) in land use management have resulted in a more sedentary livestock management system. These changes have led to more intensive stocking rates in localized areas and change in the breeds of animals used. More recent changes in the social-economic setting have forced new changes in pastoral management due to relaxation of central government controls and the implementation of a more "free-enterprise" system. What will result from these recent changes in unclear, and the effect on the human and natural resources of these arid and semi-arid regions need to be determined.

Critical Issues Factors of changes in pastoral land use in temperate East Asia

Climate:

variability. Measured as inter-annual CV; and/or emphasis on extreme events such as droughts and zud (severe winter condition);
long term trends. Climate data and historical information;
seasonality. Early growing seasonal CV or coincidence of temperature and precipitation.

Vulnerability/Resilience of Pastoral Systems:

biophysical determinants, including climate, soil, plant cover etc.;
socio-economic, political and demographic determinants.

Policy:

Government programs and incentives, usually aimed at sedentarization, intensification;
Shifts in political structure or administrative philosophy, i.e. change from socialistic to more capitalistic perspectives in Mongolia.

Market Forces:

Prices of livestock production such as cashmere, meat, dairy products, wool etc.;
Distance to the market.

Culture:

Pastoral-based culture vs. farming traditions in Inner Mongolia;
Persistence of traditional nomadic pastoralism in Mongolia.

Management Systems:

Traditional vs. sedentary;
Emergence of hierarchy of informal institutions such as hot ail (several households who share their resources), neg golynhon (people from the same river valley), neg nutgiinhan (people from the same living area) in Mongolia after privatization of livestock in early 1990s.

Key Research Issues/Questions

What is the relationship to land use patterns determined by climate variability or by land use or economic policies.
What factors contributes to the change in the vulnerability and resilience of pastoral systems?
How is the recent changes in land use intensification affecting pastoral institutions? Rangeland ecosystem structure and function? Rangeland biodiversity?
How are the changes in social structures of nomadic peoples affecting sustainable use of the steppe ecosystems?
Where are thresholds of land cover/use changes along the transects? What are factors impacting on dynamics of the thresholds?

Intensification of Agriculture

Background. Agricultural output of the Temperate East region is one of the greatest in the world, and is well known for its double and triple cropping systems. High soil fertility, good climate conditions, and an industrious human resource base have all contributed to the rich agricultural production. However, a key issue for the regions is related to food security for the future. In order to maintain current levels of agricultural productivity, there is a need to identify the factors that will maintain sustainability of the agricultural systems relative to climate and other environmental factors. However, the variability is social-economic characteristics also influence the potential output of the agricultural systems and the extent by these systems may be enhanced.

There is a need to survey what agricultural systems exist. Also an analysis of which agricultural system would benefit by intensification of land use practices vs. what region may increase its productivity by increasing the land area under cultivation. Agricultural practices in the TEA has undergone radical changes in the production practices. During the past several decades the use of fertilizer has been markedly increased, introduction of high yielding varieties have been widely used, development of new irrigation systems, increased use of fertilizers, and other changes in agricultural practices. The result has been a significant increase in crop yields over past few decades. However the ability of the region to maintain this increase in crop production under current land use practices is questioned and in many areas soil fertility and water availability has declined. Changes in social structures within Asia may greatly alter the conservation of the environment due to loss of coherency among land users with the rural communities. The manner in which further agricultural developments are implemented or maintained in the region is a critical issue given the increasing human resource demands for agricultural production.

Critical Issues of Driving Factors of Agricultural Changes

climate factors
economic system and policy
population
technology adoption
urbanization or industrialization (lifestyle change)
world market (land use planning)

Key Research Questions

Sustainability.
Food Security
Resource Availability and productivity
Land Use Conflict
Effect of Economic system on land productivity

Urban-Rural Interaction (Land Use/Cover Changes Related with Urbanization)

Background

The Prospect of tremendous growth of urban centers is staggering to perceive in the coming decades in Asia. Urban centers in Asia will number over 15, accounting for over 60% of the cities with populations greater than 10 million people. The urban growth is greatly modifying not only the surrounding area , but also rural areas and impacts of these changes on croplands, fuel resources, and water supply will be tremendous. How the reconstruction of these areas to cope with these issues and what effects will have the rural areas is and will increase in its importance in the coming decade.

As growth in population levels of urban areas continues, issues related to LUCC become increasingly a major factor in determining the viability of these urban areas. Questions related to the type of social structural entities that are needed to maintain the urban centers need to be addressed. This set of sectoral issues will rely more heavily on the understanding of social-economic topics. New integrated understanding may be needed to address these issues.

Critical Issues

1. Very rapid economic growth and population increase in urban areas

In last two decades, human population in urban areas has been increasing in East Asia, especially in rapid economic growth areas. There are two reasons for this population increase; one is natural increment caused by high ratio of young generation in cities; and, the other is social increment caused by migration from rural areas. The majority of migrating people are young, so that the latter enhances the former. Although there is no formal statistics, it is said that illegal migration from rural areas has been a very serious issue in China. Two reasons have been pointed out for this migration; one is positive, and the other, negative. The positive reason is that cities attract people by higher income and job opportunities and better living standard, such as public services. The negative reason is that rural areas can afford only limited numbers of people, depending on its capacity; in contrast, industrialization of rapid growth areas require cheap labor more than before; thus, more rural people have migrated to cities.

2. Decrease of highly productive grain cropland in rapid economic growth areas.

In terms of land use, urbanization and industrialization are competitive to agricultural activity. Both require wide and flat space and adequate fresh water resources. Rapid economic growth in East Asia have developed predominantly in the expansive low elevation plains of Asia. These fertile plains once supported a very productive grain producing economy. This agrarian economical based system is being displaced by more industrial and urban enterprises in this fertile region. Loss of arable land to urban expansion is a growing concern, especially when consumption patterns of the population is also rapidly changing. Rapid economic growth and urbanization have particularly strong effect on the communities, land uses and their environments in suburban rural areas. The major changes in these areas include not only the loss of good arable land as a direct result of urban expansion, but also socio-economic changes, such as the change in employment structure, that has no less influence on food production in suburban rural areas.

3. Environmental problems caused by rapid economic growth.

Mutually interacting dynamics of human population and economic growth will be referred to as pressure components, generating a demand for food, water, energy and raw materials. As these pressure components increase in urban areas, and the associated intensification of demands for food, fiber, building supplies, water, and other resources result in environmental degradation due to increased fertilizer and pesticide use in agriculture practices, polluted water discharge onto surface water, and increased emissions of air pollutants. These environmental pressures have changed the state of environment of urban areas and of the surrounding region.

5. Influences of rapid economic growth and urbanization on rural areas

It is not only in the vicinity of the major cities, as seen in 3 above, but also in more remote rural areas, where rapid economic growth and urbanization are changing communities, land uses and their environments. For example, the increasing demand of food in the major cities has a profound effect on the government's policy to develop new agricultural areas in peripheral regions. Such changes as industrialization or construction of new road networks that connect large cities also have very important effect on the land use in rural areas (regions), both directly and indirectly.

Key Questions

1. How fast and serious is the migration to urban and its surrounding areas?

It is very important to estimate future trend of urban population and its age structure because these values are fundamental to project future demands of food, energy, water, services and raw materials. It is rather easy to estimate the natural increase of population and the transform of age structure if census statistics are reliable. However, it is common for developing countries that these are scarce and sparse. To make the matter much worse, we have heard that illegal migration to cities are very common, but there are no statistics about that.

2. What is the mechanism of competition for land and other resources between urban and the surrounding areas?

To understand and project how rapidly cropland has been reduced, the mechanism of land use competition should be studied. This mechanism is fully dependent on social and economic factors as well as policies. In almost all countries, the mechanism of land use competition is mixture of free market concept and governmental regulations. However, the way of mixture differs among countries and even among regional (provincial scale). Furthermore, land use regulations differ between regions even in the same country. For instance, in the Tokyo Metropolitan area, a special law to enhance the conversion of farmland to urban use has been adopted since 1980s; however, other areas, this conversion has been restricted by another law.

3. What kinds of influences of rapid economic growth and urbanization on suburban rural areas are expected? How rapid has urban area expanded and will it expand, and how much has arable land decreased and will it decrease?

4. What kinds of environmental issues are concerned caused by rapid economic growth and urban expansion?

The state of environment in developing countries is even worse than that in developed countries although industrialization or urbanization has not advanced to the level of developed countries. Air pollution due to SOx, NOx may be much worse because of old and untreated motor vehicles and combustion of low quality coal in domestic use. Canals and channels in cities might have been more polluted by untreated effluents from industry, agricultural and domestic sectors. Water may also polluted by bacteria. Other serious problems are huge volumes of industrial and domestic wastes and health problems caused by chemical wastes. Very limited quantitative data on these issues have been reported, therefore, we can only point out possible negative environmental problems in developing countries at present.

5. What kinds of influences of rapid economic growth and urbanization on rural areas (regions) are expected? What are the magnitude and speed of the changes driven by those influences? What kinds of influences of urban areas on other rural areas (regions) are expected?

Tasks

Task 1. Analysis of the mechanism of migration to cities from rural areas.

The mechanism of migration from rural areas to cities is very complicated and depends on social and economic conditions of studied areas. As mentioned in Critical Issues, there are two reasons of migration; positive one and negative one; however, it is not easy to determine critical value of income and services which have rural people decide to migrate to cities, and to estimate the carrying capacity of rural areas. To understand these multidisciplinary local and regional case studies are required.

Task 2. Analysis of the mechanism of competition for land and other resources between urban and the surrounding areas.

As noted in IGBP Report No.35/HDP Report No.7, lands are managed differently by different class of human agents. Agents also differ in such attributes as temporal and spatial scale of production, intensity, integration into non-local market processes, adaptation and attitudes toward risk, demographic and tenurial characteristics. Local and regional model describing the land use competition and consequent change must be grounded in a firm understanding of these relationships. A geo-referenced model is useful for this purpose.

Task 3. Analyses and future projections of influences of rapid economic growth and urbanization on suburban rural areas, particularly the reduction, fragmentation and qualitative changes of arable land due to urban expansion.

It is necessary to analyze the influences of rapid economic growth and urbanization on the land uses in suburban rural areas. The study should include not only the loss of good arable land as a direct result of urban expansion, but also socio-economic changes, such as the changes in employment structure, that have no less influence on food production in suburban rural areas. The future projections of these influences and the overall mechanisms of land use changes will have to be based on the careful observation of the past and the present states and sound scenario of the future changes.

Task 4. Impact analysis of rapid economic growth and urban on environment.

UNEP has adopted a new analytical framework to outline the state of environment both current and future risks systematically. Environmental changes result from interactions between the human and environmental systems. In order to understand the environmental changes, it was proposal that the dynamic nature of these interactive systems were assessed within a driving forces - pressure- state - impact- response frame work. Social and economic development exert pressure on the environment, and as a consequence, the state of environment changes. These changes then have impacts on social and economic functions of the environment, such as the provision of adequate conditions for health, resources availability and biodiversity. Finally, these impacts may elicit a social response that feeds back on the driving forces. The real world is more complex and dynamic than can be expressed in the above simple causal relation, of course; however, the above simple cycle is the first task to provide an understandable structure of environment change.

Task 5. Analysis of the influences of rapid economic growth and urbanization on rural areas.

It is necessary to analyze the influences of rapid economic growth and urbanization on the land uses not only in suburban rural areas, but also in more remote rural areas (regions). Such analyses should be based on the understanding that these influences must be treated with multi-scale view. The macroscopic view might include the effect of increasing demand of food in the major urban areas on the government's policy to develop new agricultural lands in peripheral regions. The study should include not only the loss of good arable land as a direct result of urban expansion, but also socio-economic changes, such as the changes in employment structure, that have no less influence on food production in rural areas (regions). The influences of such changes as industrialization or the construction of new road networks that connect large cities should also be carefully analyzed. The future projections of these influences and the overall mechanisms of land use changes will have to be based on the careful observation of the past and the present states and sound scenario of the future changes.

Factors Affecting Changes in Natural and Managed Forests.

Background. The long history of human land use in the region have altered the forested lands extensively. The land area of remaining forest in the region is less than 25%. Of this forest area, much of the area is now managed and have been planted with plantations species. There is very little natural forests left in TEA. The value of wood and the shrinking market for wood products elsewhere will create increasing pressure to harvest more trees and shorten rotations. The impact of these changes on wild life, water resources, and soil protection maybe significant. Despite the importance of the remaining forest area to ecological dynamics and human welfare, little is known about the factors affecting forest cover in the region or the extent of the forest cover area.

This region is unique in the world with the continuous distribution of forest ecosystems from north to south along the east coast, peninsula and islands, covering taiga, temperate, subtropical, and tropical forests. Due to high human density and fast growing of population, long history of civilization and rapid industrialization, the land use change in this region has been very serious. Many research activities and data collected in the last decades are available for LUCC studies.

Critical Issues.

1. Deforestation due to urbanization, industrialization and population increase in China and S. Korea..

2. Decline of productivity and ecological functions such as water and soil conservation, caused by unreasonable management, such as poor cutting practice, poor site preparation, monospecies plantations, etc.

3. Loss or decline of biodiversity due to lost and fragmentation of the habitats.

4. Reforestation and regeneration after dramatic fire in Russian Far East forest.

5. Approaches for sustainable management of secondary forest.

Key Questions

Tasks

1. Linking existing research stations and establishing a north-south transect through the east-coast area of Asian Continent and islands for land use change studies in forest area.

2. Monitoring and research of structure, function, and dynamics of forest cover changes in relation with development of agriculture, urbanization, industrialization, and environmental changes.

3. Developing data base for integration of ground- and space-based observation data.

4. Developing join-training program, workshop, and conference.

5. Policy for sustainable forest ecosystem and land use in forest area.

INTEGRATION ACTIVITIES

The ability to analyze the integrated effects of the factors controlling ecosystem and socio-economic integrity relative to changes in socio-economic, climate and land use management factors of these temperate ecosystems is a complicated task. A framework to simplify the complex interactions within and between various subsystems needs to be developed to organize fieldwork, modeling, and other related activities. Development of the framework for assessing changes and incorporation of information to integrate factors controlling ecosystem and socio-economic dynamics in the Temperate East Asian region is the focus of this research plan.

Our ability to predict changes in the human-ecological system relative to climate or land use changes is dependent on the development of analytical tools to integrate our current understanding of how these ecosystems behave relative to human and environmental factors. A framework to simplify the complex interactions within and between various subsystems is provided using a modelling approach that includes all the major components and links them together in a spatially integrated fashion. At the core of this approach is an ecological process model that incorporates the changes in external forcing factors, including climate and management on net primary productivity and carbon.

Development of critical databases on physical, ecological and social-economic factors.

Database compilation of climate, topography, soils, and vegetation will be needed in order to evaluate land use and climate interactions for various land management practices implemented in the region. The use point or station data interpolated across the region will be made when possible. Remote sensing data for land cover will be incorporated in the analysis of current land cover and land use for the region. A number of research groups are actively working on a set of land cover data bases for this region.

Information on various levels of social institutions needs to be evaluated to identify the manner in which decisions are made that determine land-use systems under political units in the region. The analysis of this information will need to incorporate the critical factors of the physical environment, including climate and soil factors, but also include the human factors. Predictions of long-term agricultural and ecological sustainability in relationship to variations in livestock abundance, cropping types, and other land uses are needed to assess the full range of ecological impacts of agricultural development. These predictions require a synthesis of the long-term effects of livestock on forage plant production and survival; the effects of human wood use on woody plant populations; the direct and indirect effects of livestock on soil structure and fertility; and agricultural use of water, soil, other resources, and technologies. The importance of past and current climate and land use cannot be overlooked in assessing the how these ecosystems has developed over the centuries and changes in the future relative to new policies, technological advances, economic conditions, and environmental constraints.

Development of analytical procedures

Scaling of information between ecological and physical data and social-economic data needs special attention due to the difference in the factors defining boundaries defining ecological and social-economic systems. Physical data can often be spatially defined by topographic boundaries such as watershed, mountain ranges, river basins, etc. However, social-economic data are often organized by geopolitical boundaries, with little connection between the physical and social-economic scales. Time scale differences between the two systems are also quite distinct. Physical data can often range from continuous to point data, whereas, social-economic data are snapshots in time, ranging from annual to decadal in nature (e.g., taxation data, census data, birth rate, etc.). These differences between the physical, ecological, and social-economic systems create a number of problems for integration of data across these systems, however, a number of methods are being developed to integrate across these systems and evaluation of these techniques need to be applied for the situations found in this region.

Strategy for modeling activities

Models need to be able to evaluate land uses and ecological integrity along a gradient of environmental factors. With these models, we will be able to evaluate various scenarios of land use and climatic changes. The models employed are capable of simulating ecosystem responses to changes in climate and to various land use practices at the landscape to regional scale, and include processes such as, plant production, soil fertility, water availability, and agroecosystem dynamics. These models are used at various spatial and temporal scales. Models that integrate information on policy, economic, social, and cultural factors within a given environmental setting and provide information on land use practices need to be formulated.

TECHNICAL ASPECTS TO CONSIDER

General Comments

In order to solve issues facing environmental conditions in Temperate East Asia there is a need to develop a set of methodologies for studying land use/cover changes in the TEA region. There are a number of unique characteristics of the region which will call for specific development of available technologies. These analytical tools are designed to look at the various issues relevant to LUTEA and outline the appropriate methodologies for the study of land use/cover change. The following methodological issues are addressed:

Integration of Social and Physical Data Sets
Development of Remote Sensing Information for Detecting Land Cover/Land Use Changes
Analysis of Land Cover/ Use Change along Transect Study areas
Analytical Framework for Assessing and Verification of Sustainable Land Use and Change

Integration of Social and Physical Data Sets

One of the greatest challenges to land use/cover change studies in the interdisciplinary nature of the data sets which are used in the analysis of factors driving land use changes. As a community we are faced with using statistical data, survey data, and physical data sets that are collected at different temporal and spatial scales. The development of a framework to integrate these data to address issues related to land productivity, land use management, and sustainable land use is needed to further the analysis of land use/cover changes in this region. The following topics were identified:

Methods of "down-scaling" social data to match spatial distribution of land cover data;
Land management information incorporated into modeling of changes in the physical domain;
Identification of ecosystem changes that affect economic outcomes; identification of economic factors that affect ecosystem dynamics.

In the TEA region, there are good records of land use/cover, e.g. Chinese chronicles, Japanese topographic maps, and hence, the region is in a unique position that we can pursue historical study. Particular effort should be made to produce data sets for the last 100 years. Temporal dimension is essential for the understanding of land use/cover change mechanisms.

In developing data sets for LUTEA studies issues related to spatial resolution needs to be considered. For land use/cover data 1:100,000 scale (or -50m resolution level) is desired as the largest scale standard, in order to see settlement and their changed. For population and socio-economic scale data, typically, county level (China) or municipal level (Japan) would be considered to be the minimum resolution unit which LUTEA should consider.

For physical environment data, 1 km resolution is needed for general characterization of land cover and temporal dynamics. For more selected areas on purposes, higher resolution is required. LUTEA data sets should be multi-scale, with stronger emphasis on larger scales than those of most other IGBP projects. Use of Scale-Variance-Component, which was proposed by Maeller and Tobler, is one of effective methods to find out the "relevant area unit" for the explanation of certain type of spatial distribution.

Integrated Comprehensive Case studies for "Typical" areas

Integrated case studies ( or sets of case studies) for selected areas will produce useful data for the understanding of larger areas. Cross-cultural comparative studies are also useful for that. Integrated case studies, including remote sensing, ground truth measurement, data collection, and, modeling, will provide information on critical data sets, integrated methods and procedures between physical data sets and socio-economic ones.

Data Requirements

Physical 1-km data set exists, and would be analytically useful to link the socio-economic data sets to 1-km physical data sets. Municipal boundary data are available in various polygonal data sets. Different issues determine what scale of data is needed, however, there should be methods to aggregate or decompose different data sets up and down scale dependent on the issue being addressed. Even classification changes between scales. For many situations a base map scaled to 1:100,000 land use polygon data is useful. For pastoral issues and urbanization, and agricultural system intensification, this scale is adequate. It is the process of being developed for whole China, some areas have been developed by using Landsat TM data.

Data sets integration will have to be dually supported by technical advancement (GIS, etc.) and improved understanding in the processes and mechanisms of land use and cover changes. Simple and mechanical overlay of physical data and human data in GIS will result in more misunderstanding rather than understanding, if not based on deep insight in the mechanisms and processed of land use and cover changes. Integration of physical data sets and socio-economic ones requires a common software and data format at least within LUTEA. However, we have recognize at the same time that the common method might not always be appropriate.

Development of Remote Sensing Information for Detecting Land Cover/Land Use Changes

Currently many techniques are used for the observing the Earth system from space, however detection of land use changes is a difficult task using remote sensing techniques alone. The use of new remote sensing sensors and applications can over come some of these constraints for evaluating changes in land use/cover changes. In addition to remote sensing, ground based measurements provide information of land surface conditions. The issues related to detection of land use/cover change varies depending on the type of land cover changes that are desired. These issues include:

Change in arable lands in LUTEA
Urban expansion impact on land cover changes
Land use changes as detected by changes in seasonal dynamics of croplands
Evaluation of degradation of lands with intensification of land use
Assessing biodiversity changes of different land cover types

Scale of observations is an important consideration. The use of 1-km AVHRR data may be adequate to detect large scale changes over time, but detection of cropland changes or degradation of grasslands may need information at a finer such 30-m Landsat TM data. The application of remote sensing in Mongolia to policy and decision making has played an important role in monitoring and managing the fire event in Spring of 1996. The Mongolian Ministry of Nature and Environment provides daily fire mapping (area and spatial distribution of fire) to province and local governments. Other areas for remote sensing application is natural disasters including drought, hard winter (black disaster, i.e., no snow, and white disaster, i.e., too much snow). Remote sensing data to policy maker is event-driven, more frequently when there is a event of natural disaster or hazard.

Remote sensing in Mongolia is also used for vegetation monitoring, land conditions, and snow map. Vegetation map includes historical statistical data. Nomadic livestock uses diverse summer camps. Livestock is closely linked with natural vegetation. Image processing is constrained by computing facility and ground truth. AVHRR is difficult to detect open-land (e.g., agricultural land), and currently access to Landsat TM data is limited.

There is a challenge in detecting changes in land surface related to degradation and restoration processes of vegetation. Subtle changes in plant communities are difficult to detect even at fine spatial resolution. Land surface changes results at various time-scales, and include short-term climate induced change (interannual variation), long-term climate-induced change (ecosystem structure change), and human-induced changes. In discerning changes in forest land cover, forest logging and fire disturbance also affect land cover, and are difficult to differentiate between human-induced and climate induced changes. The use of fractal analysis in landscape ecology is a possible solution in detecting regular patterns of forest, cropland, and urban boundaries related to human activities, where as climate-induced changes may have a more complex structure. Patch size and fragmentation of land cover units as shown on remote sensing images provide a potential tool to study land use intensity and extent.

In order to better quantify changes in the land surface there is a need to incorporate ground truth data by using social data of land use at the county level and to integrate this with remote sensing data. For change detection, multiple sensors and multi-temporal and spatial image data are needed to improve accuracy of land cover change detection. It is important to have regional data sets at 10 year intervals retrospectively to 1970s for AVHRR, and out into the future with new satellite sensors. The ground truth data collection can be facilitated by using techniques and equipment such as: the GPS camera; site level resample sites every years; use of land surface information related to a network of sites, e.g., China (CERN), and better utilization of the IGBP transects. These data would complement the seasonal changes provided by AVHRR and MODIS spectrometers.

There are two approaches for data distribution. One is centralized approach where all the data are stored in databases in a uniform format, which requires large facility and time-consuming and expensive (e.g., EOS DIS). Another approach is to take advantage of fast development of internet and web technology and design a web-distributed data system. In the latter approach, there is no need for a large facility and avoid asking PI to spend a lot of time to getting their data in a uniform format, which is one of major factors that people are reluctant to provide their data to centralized data base.

Transect analysis would provide gradients of social and physical driving variables which can be linked with remote sensing and field work, both on transects and sites. Sites level studies can be incorporated within the transect analysis. At the site level, one can use information based on a digital GPS or videography. So within the transect study, one can have species information and GPS photo records of the site characteristics, so a comparison with remote sensing data can be made. The linkage between modeling and remote sensing will be useful along the transect for regional analysis. Modeling requires ancillary data, as well as economic factors. We can compare modeling output to remote sensing data for validation.

To detect land cover or use changes, remote sensing data from 1970 to 1990 can establish the temporal changes in a region. The historical time series can be used to identify changes, and this information can be used to study causes of land use and cover changes. The use of remote sensing is important to monitor change detection, which is also important for regional analysis. AVHRR data is easy to use, and can be used to identify certain types of changes in an area. If we detect change areas, we should get finer scale satellite data (TM) to do more intensive analysis, and also incorporate socio-economic data. Detecting "hot spots" or fragile areas with RS data (areas with lots of activity) can be very useful. By using multiple images to evaluate changes along transition zones or along land cover boundaries. Selection of areas are important for use as land use change detection areas. Regional analysis should cover all levels, and be compatible with the IGBP, because there are similar data sources.

Modeling is important for land use analysis and remote sensing. Modeling can give provide relational analysis of linkages between the socio-economic characteristics in combination with physical data. The most basic administrative units are small, and there are may sub units below. They all have spatial characteristics. They do spacial information at the basic level for spatial data and found it to be measurable. They have info at the county level, and its difficult to get smaller information than this from the administrators. But remote sensing data can possible capture this. Data fusion is a way to redistribute administrative unit data into a spatial format. This is necessary for spatial modeling. This will allow us to model the spatial distribution of lans use and cover to compare with remote sensing data. The socio-economic model will be made spatial. County data can be distributed spatially. Historical data is used and back calculated. Remote sensing can be used as initial conditions. County level made spatially explicit is very important.

Analysis of Land Cover/Use Change along Transect Study areas

Transects represent changes in gradients of physical and socio-economic factors across the LUTEA region. These transects are useful research tools for various studies of LUTEA.

How we can use the transects to better estimate land use and land cover characteristics of consist with LUTEA objectives?
What kinds of measurements are needed along the transect that would be useful to LUTEA?
What information is needed at the extensive scale (e.g., remote sensing at coarse scale) vs. what needs to be collected in detailed, fine grained analysis (e.g., surveys, TM, land scape analysis)

Transects are built along gradients, including physical and socio-economic gradients. These are not necessarily linear, but follow climate gradients or trends. Thresholds at which new spatial and temporal structures (ecosystems, land cover) occur along the transects are important for land cover change studies. These boundaries are dynamic and the most sensitive to environmental and human impacts. Study of these threshold levels of great scientific interest. The following points are guidelines to the use of transects for LUCC analysis in the LUTEA study.

Human impacts increases complexity of spatial land cover structures. Directions are not equal, like around towns or rivers.
We capture different spatial structures at different scales.
Transect is only one of tools for land use cover change studies. Fractal approach is
another tool, which may be interesting for regional application.
Physically, West-East transect (NECT) is along PPT. North-South transect is along T and PPT gradient. Thus, they capture different features.

Analytical Framework for Assessing and Verification of Sustainable Land Use and Change

It is now more common to apply various modeling and integrated assessment techniques to land use/cover change studies. The appropriate application of these models and techniques is an important consideration for LUTEA studies. What is needed is an evaluation of the different analysis techniques available and the manner in which these techniques can be applied.

For LUTEA we need to develop an analytical framework for understanding factors influencing land use/cover changes. This analytical framework needs to incorporate an integration of physical, ecological, and socio-economic components. We need an analysis technique which can be used at a local scale up to the regional scale. At the local scale, the analysis will be used to evaluate case studies of changes of land use/cover. Methodology for scaling this analysis up to the regional or sub-regional analysis.

The type of issues that we will need to apply this analytical framework include:

Sustainability of food production
Sustainability of land productivity
Vulnerability land use/cover systems

There are four main aspects of resource (i.e., land, water, biological resources, capital, labor) availability and use that the integrated assessments which need to be addressed: economic efficiency, inter-regional and inter-generational equity, sustainability, and robustness (i.e., vulnerability of fragile environments; resilience and adaptive capacity of biological/environmental and social systems). Two kinds of integrative activities are needed. First, ecological and atmospheric/environmental interface needs to be dynamically coupled by linking processes between systems in a modeling framework. Second, research on embedding biophysical and socio-economic processes within a common analytical framework at appropriate scales for regional analysis needs to be completed.

Integration of physical, ecological, demographic and socio-economic components should be conducted within both field and modeling studies for at least the following scales: the level of land management (i.e., farm/firm level or household), the level watershed or eco-zone, and the regional (i.e., province, national, TEA region) level. 'Horizontal' linkages in integrated assessments should include both spatial relationships (e.g., trade, migration, rural-urban dependencies, water transfer, transportation networks) and sectoral relationships (e.g., competition for inputs and resources, employment opportunities, changed supply and demand). Techniques for integration must aim for a balanced application of tools such as GIS, remote sensing, field surveys, site studies, spatial statistical methods, and modeling, along transects and/or possibly other appropriate sampling schemes.

Verification of models

Validation and verification of models is considered essential. Strategies were discussed that could help LUCC application to be "anchored in reality." It was recognized that formal statistical validation procedures can generally not be applied to complex dynamic models. Nevertheless, there are several procedures that can help to ensure that model characteristics and dynamics reflect reality.

Five strategies were suggested:

Scrutinizing and testing of model specification in an inter-disciplinary dialog
Estimation and testing of parameters with statistical methods
Testing of models in case studies
Model backcasting experiments

Comparison with historical analogues

A recognition that all of these procedures are relevant and applicable to all types of models. For instance, historical analogues may be more helpful and meaningful in verifying vegetation models than for testing models projecting socio-economic and technological processes. Concrete case studies in a multi-disciplinary setting are regarded essential to extend theories across disciplines and advance model building and verification.

Methodological strategies

Available time did not allow an in-depth discussion of this last item addressed to the working groups. In the debate, several of the conclusions derived from an Electronic Conference, recently organized by the IGBP-IHDP LUCC Project and the Environment and Climate RTD Programme (European Commission, Directorate General XII/D) and aimed at developing an European LUCC research strategy,  were reviewed and affirmed. The road to comprehensive analysis capable of dealing with sustainable land resources use and change in a more holistic way is paved with a number of research topics that should be addressed in LUTEA. These include:

Decision making processes at the land management level
Impacts of landscape changes on quality attributes on resource stocks and ecological complexity
Description of environmental functions and services of land and land cover (other than production)
Embedding of spatially explicit (biophysical, biological, ecological, etc.) research in economic analysis
Cultural, ethical and normative aspects of land use

Consolidation and development of data systems is an obvious prerequisite as well. Integrated LUCC analysis needs a balanced effort to compile four types of data: land use and land cover, economic, societal, and environmental. Efforts should be devoted to ensuring spatial and temporal compatibility. This includes consistency in spatial resolution, coverage and definition, and careful attention to process specific frequency, and coincidence of reference dates. In the TEA region, as anywhere else, improving compatibility amongst institutions and facilitating access to existing data would help building better models.

STATUS OF CURRENT RESEARCH ACTIVITIES

A large number of recently funded research projects are currently investigating various aspects of land use/cover changes in the TEA region. The studies involve a large international set of research groups, and highlight the importance this region represents globally. These studies include researchers from China, Mongolia, Japan, Russia, various other European countries and the USA. A preliminary list is provided in the Appendix 1.

Activities for LUTEA

The KYOTO workshop made the following recommendations:

hold regional workshop in late 1997 or early 1998
develop integrated database structure
conduct sectoral workshops
develop communication structure in conjunction with TEACOM secretariat

In order to accomplish these goals, we propose to hold a workshop of the research groups who participated in the KYOTO workshop to further synthesize the results to date. The outcome of the workshop will be a proceedings that will define the current research issues and identify what critical research gaps are present. The workshop will review the progress with the development of the analytical framework and set priorities of future research and integration efforts. Evaluation of critical data sets relative to land cover maps, socio-economic data, important policy trends, physical data, and ecological resource data will be made.

The workshop will be a combination of invited speakers, poster sessions, and working group discussions. The material will be synthesized into a proceedings that will be published within the coming year to be distributed to the participants and to government and scientific organizations.

Training grants

Young investigators

Research fellowships for development and analysis of data bases and to work with member of the LUTEA network.

RELATIONSHIP TO LUCC, START, AND OTHER NATIONAL AND IGBP GLOBAL CHANGE CORE PROJECTS

The LUCC under TEACOM study is designed to provide critical information to the LUCC Core Project from this important geopolitical and environmental region of the world. The objectives of this study is to synthesize case study results within the regional context. The analysis will be incorporated into the LUCC global analysis. The study will also provide critical information to GCTE, IGAC, BAHC, and PAGES on the impact of land use changes on pertinent earth system dynamics. The analysis will also provide information for scientific assessment of the effects of land use change on natural resources that may alter the ability of people to sustain themselves.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Data base should be created to be available to specialists and public, not just modelers
It is important to link with several international data base servicing initiatives, such as CIESIN, and so on.
International data base initiatives
CIESEN
Global Environment Map Project (National Institute for Geography in Japan)
UNEP/GRID

Unifying categorization of land use/land cover should be pursued among international framework like IGU and CIESIN.

LUTEA should have a data manager for providing with common tools and data format as well as for data and information distribution over TEA region.
The data may be managed at a single center, or at several centers networked together.
CIESIN is becoming a big data center of Chinese data.
LUTEA Web site link to data base was recommended.

LUTEA STEERING COMMITTEE

Ojima, Dennis (Chairperson)
Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory
Colorado State University
Fort Collins, CO 80523 USA
Phone: 1 970 491 1976
Fax: 1 970 491 1965
E-mail:
dennis@nrel.colostate.edu

Zhao, Shidong
CERN Secretariat
Chinese Academy of Science
P.O. Box 9717
Building 917, 3 Datun Road
Beijing 100101
P.R. CHINA
Phone: 86 10 6494 8463, 86 10 64948463
Fax: 86 10 6493 1970
E-mail: zhaosd@cern.ac.cn

Fu, Congbin
START Regional Center for Temperate East Asia
Institute of Atmospheric Physics
Chinese Academy of Sciences
De Sheng Men Wai Str
Qi Jai Huo Zi
Beijing 100029
P.R. CHINA
Phone: 86 10 6204 1317
Fax: 86 10 6204 5230, 86 10 6256 2458
E-mail: fcb@ast590.tea.ac.cn or fucb@becp.ihep.ac.cn

Togtohyn, Chuluun
Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory
Colorado State University
Fort Collins, CO 80523 USA
Phone: 1 970 491 1609
Fax: 1 970 491 1965
E-mail: chuluun@nrel.colostate.edu

Otsubo, Kuninori (Sitting in for Kitamura)
Center for Global Environment Research
National Institute for Environmental Studies
16-2 Onogawa, Tsukuba
Ibaraki 305 JAPAN
Phone: 81 298 50 2417
Fax: 81 298 50 2576
E-mail: kuninori@nies.go.jp

Kitamura, Teitaro
Tokyo University of Agriculture
35 Hanazonocho, Iwakura
Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606
JAPAN
Phone/Fax: 81 75 711 2560

Karakin, Vladimir
Deputy Head of the Natural Resources Department
Pacific Institute of Geography
38 Verkhne Portovaya Street
3rd Floor, Room 116
Vladivostok 690000
RUSSIA
Phone: 7 10 4232 517818
Fax: 7 10 4232 269350
E-mail: root@eptgal.marine.su or eptdean@online.vladivostok.ru

Liu, Ji-yuan
Institute of Remote Sensing Application
Chinese Academy of Sciences
P.O. Box 9718
Beijing 100101
P.R. CHINA
Phone: 86 10 6491 9961
Fax: 86 10 6491 5035
E-mail: irsaglob@mimi.cnc.ac.cn

Himiyama, Yukio
Professor, Hokkaido University of Education,
9-chome, Hokumoncho,
Asahikawa-City
Hokkaido 070, JAPAN
Phone:81-166-51-6151
Fax:81-166-52-0035
E-mail: himiyama@atson.asa.hokkyodai.ac.jp

Lee Dowon

This page coded by Karen Shibuya and is © NREL 1999. It was last updated Friday, October 15, 1999 02:00:49 PM