Survey for local communities and organizations. (Working Draft)

Current ecosystems

What are the current conditions or states of the ecosystems and human communities within the larger area?

Personal data
Place of residence

Are the current ecosystems completely exotic?

HISTORICAL DATA

DESIRED/FUTURE ECOSYSTEMS

This lengthy list of questions develops data about perceptions of satisfaction with living and values regarding the environment, all of which determines in turn the likelihood of continued population shifts and of willingness to cooperate with a planning effort.

The following questions will be answered by land managers, scientific data, and others:

Work Plan

1. Reconnaissance

Familiarize self with existing community structures and boundaries, identify sources of information and for people who are interested in the issues of land and watershed management in the Rio Puerco.

Collect data from external sources such as political maps, census data, economic data bases, and other informants (literature, personal contact, etc.).

Time: Two Months: One in New Mexico, one in literature and data base research.

2. Engagement

Contact identified leadership, begin to explore the feasibility of conducting a survey in the area, facilitate and collaborate with community around obtaining community information, begin development of problem statement. Assesment of community interest and involvement in water and land issues.

Time: Concurrent with step one in New Mexico, plus one week per month for three to four months.

3. Planning

Begin planning for survey, work on phraseology of questions, and best method of giving the survey using local committee and leadership (includes fed and state land managers). Help committee to publicize its activities and the survey.

Time: Concurrent with end of step two, leading into winter months; two weeks per month until survey questionairre is completed.

4. Implementation

Adminisiter the survey to each local community, analyze results using statistical methods suitable for a descriptive study.

Time: One week for each community (each stakeholder group is a community) One month for statistical analysis.

Share results with each committee, set new meetings for actual problem definitions and modeling activities, (these will probably cover more than one meeting) and begin consensus building. The process for these meetings will be decided upon by the committee.

Time: One week per community.

Convene a watershed wide modeling group composed of representative from each locality to begin problem definition, modeling, and planning for the watershed.

Land managers develop final plan, which is shared with large group.

Time: To be determined, preferably before the Field Conferance. The exact length of time and how that time will be used will be determined with the help of the group.

Land managers develop final plan, which is shared with large group.

5. Evaluation

Evaluate process and information developed through this method. Set process for continued involvement of committees in the watershed planning process.

6. Disengagement

Withdraw from activities.